Post by Egao, Egao Everywhere on Jul 26, 2013 8:21:16 GMT -8
I made a list of three common types of character applications. Which of them do you prefer? How effective and convenient are they? And is it practical and effective of sites to use the character application as a sampling for a roleplay's writing skill? Even with an RP sample, is it good enough?
If you know other styles of character applications, share them! I know there must be a lot out there but I'm not going to bother researching all. Though I'm not really sure what other styles could be out there besides these three. A lot of them would be just a variation.
Traditional-paragraphThe traditional-paragraph style is description-oriented. It's opened with basic character facts followed by its three main parts: description, personality, history. This is the most professional style as it covers all general information required. It's what you'd have when you need information on a certain person like in criminal investigations. You'd want to know what they look like, what their background is, and what kind of person they are.
As much of a workload TPS is, I like this style a lot. It does help me cover a lot about my character that I didn't think of. The history can be a SRSLY MAJOR PAIN and hmm, actually that's the only part I don't like about TPS. I love the description area the most. I don't think an image could ever replace it. Character description is not all about statistical data like eye color, height, and so on. When you describe, you need to make an impression of how your character strikes to others just by his or her looks. How they stand, walk, etc.
Traditional-listingThe traditional-listing style is field-oriented. It includes basic character facts but unlike the traditional, it doesn't require descriptive paragraphs. The description area is not used, substituted by the use of face-claims instead (sometimes, it's still asked though); the personality area is divided into two: positive and negative, which is filled up with a minimum amount of traits; and the history is usually modified depending on the site. Sometimes, sites rename them as the "etc" section where major points of the character's life can be cited rather than asking for a run-through of the character's complete biography.
A common mark of a TLS is its number of extra fields not found in TPS. Some of these fields are sexuality, likes and dislikes, and hobbies. This is to cover other aspects of the character (which usually ties in to the listed personality traits) since it would be otherwise too short, brief, and even lacking.
TLS is very convenient. I don't hate them or anything but I don't think they're effective at all. It's not that I look at people and think they suck at characterization but people need to be pushed to make an effort to really understand what they have in mind. It can't stop on ability alone. TLS is good for chill sites though.
FreeformThe freeform style is like what its name says. The app allows the roleplayer full freedom on how to present their character. It's considered to be more advanced (but not necessarily better!) than the traditional because, besides the creative effort, the character's personality and history must will be somehow presented. The advantage of this app is its more hands-on approach to the character as there is usually roleplaying involved in a freeform style.
There are a lot of dangers in a freeform app as it could not always provide information others may want to know about from the character. The lack of categories can make it a difficult reference for people who are searching for specific information about the character.
The freeform style of app have a lot of variations. They can be done through prompts, roleplaying, and - the best style I've seen so far - interview. I'm a fan of freeform-RP but as length can vary from rper to rper and character to character, it can be a troublesome reference point. A freeform-interview manages to fix this by using a questionnaire-style app, which does a secure a good amount of content depending on the number of questions. Initially, this came off corny to me because of the cross of OOC (the interview question) and the IC (the character's response) but that's most likely because of my background in fanfiction.net where authors seem to be talking to their characters. It can effectively display a member's grasp with their character. The big downside of this though is its applicability with certain characters and the breaking of the fourth wall is still rather quite flimsy.
If you know other styles of character applications, share them! I know there must be a lot out there but I'm not going to bother researching all. Though I'm not really sure what other styles could be out there besides these three. A lot of them would be just a variation.